Home | About TeamAsia | Clients | Job Opportunities | Speaker Opportunities | Contact Us | Sign Up  
Home > Media Articles >   1999 > The Future of Country Marketing
< Back   

 

 

The Future of Country Marketing
By Michael Alan Hamlin
October 04, 1999

Philip Kotler’s Asian tour this year involved just three countries: Hong Kong, Japan, and the Philippines. Hong Kong is notorious for failed public presentations by big-name speakers, and I was more than a little curious about the reception Mr. Kotler would receive (Full Disclosure: My firm organized the Hong Kong, our first there by the way, and Manila presentations.). Fortunately, I needn’t have worried.

There are just two or three top management speakers in the world today. In my view, they are Mr. Kotler, Harvard Business School’s Michael E. Porter, and the legendary Peter Drucker. The up-and-coming experts, at least for me, are people like Jerry Porras and James Collins, the authors of Built to Last, Adrian Slywotzky, author of Profit Migration, Gary Hamel and C.K. Prahalad, authors of Competing for the Future, Robert Kaplan of balanced scorecard fame, and Fred Wiersema, author of Customer Intimacy.

While there are a good many other substantial gurus, authors, future-casters, and motivational speakers who have an important impact on the way business is done, organizations developed, and people inspired, for the moment, these ten — based on my own views and limited knowledge — are the most sought-after management speakers today.

And for good reason. Executive director of the Poon Kam Kai Institute of Management at the University of Hong Kong Gregg Li explained the new interest in management experts to me last week by way of comparison with foreign investment in educational infrastructure in Hong Kong and Singapore. You’ll recall that the University of Chicago and Insead are both building business campuses in Singapore. These are not in partnership with the government or other institutions. They are 100 percent foreign-owned initiatives. Aside from these two, the Wharton School is helping Singapore set up Singapore Management University, which is being developed based on the U.S. b-school model. The National University of Singapore has its own set of cooperative linkages.

"All those schools came to Hong Kong first," Mr. Li explained, "but the government wasn’t interested in providing incentives for their investment here. ‘What do we need you for?’ they asked." However, when Insead and the University of Chicago went to Singapore, things were very different. The Singapore government was not only interested in encouraging their investment, they were prepared to seduce these institutions into Singapore, and did.

The reason of course is simple. Mr. Li says Hong Kong’s attitude evolved from, "the arrogance of success" that has so dramatically turned global industry leaders — IBM, Xerox, Kodak, Apple, GM — into jelly before painfully recreating themselves. Like these companies, Mr. Li suggests, Hong Kong appeared to think it was so good that it had nothing to learn from anyone else. And like these companies, it’s increasingly apparent that wasn’t the case. Hong Kong — as we all do — has a lot to learn.

Mr. Drucker is fond of telling his audience that learning is no longer something people do principally in the first 20 years or so of their lives. The pace of change in today’s global economy has made learning a lifetime undertaking. U.S. Federal Reserve chief Alan Greenspan likewise has taken of late to reminding the top executives of the world’s most profitable companies and largest financial institutions that the strength of the U.S. economy evolves almost entirely from its capacity to turn new learning into better products and services. And most of that learning — by a huge margin — takes place in educational institutions and entrepreneurial firms.

It was no surprise that Mr. Kotler’s well-attended presentation was characterized as much by the substantive questions and issues raised by the Hong Kong and Philippine participants as his own value-packed observations. The most startling impression that I received was that the participants felt that Hong Kong didn’t know any more what it was, and therefore is adrift (Sound familiar?).

For Mr. Kotler, a country is a brand. How well the brand is known depends on at least two things: 1) Does the brand stand for anything; and, 2) Is it well communicated? Note that I said "communicated," not advertised. There’s a big difference according to Mr. Kotler, but that’s another story. To get back to branding, finding out what the Hong Kong and the Philippines brands stand for is a matter of first determining what they are good at, finding out whether that’s valued, and then promoting the brand.

In the Philippines’ case the nation’s strengths are pretty apparent. In my view, the Philippines has the potential to soar, for instance, in engine-of-growth sectors like technology (hardware and software engineering), Internet-related services (e-commerce, design, development, hosting, maintaining), and infocommunications (global call centers and document management). Other industries that are both high profile and provide promising prospects for building substantial wealth are entertainment (creative services, production, distribution), health (world-class health and medical services at great prices), and publishing (editorial, production services, distribution).

And in fact, these industries have most of the components in place required to thrive — save government support. By government support, I don’t mean talking about export champions and hiring big-name public relations agencies in New York and Washington. Government support would come in, for instance, in these ways: 1) seduce educational and infrastructure investments that support these industries; 2) charm trophy investors into the country; and, 3) and most important, communicate consistently and effectively. "Bring the reporters here," Prof. Kotler advises, rather than send a trade mission to Europe or America, to communicate the nation’s strengths. "They’ll write about you." Credibly.

Sounds pretty simple, and it would be far cheaper. More importantly, it would work. Prof. Kotler shows that we don’t need lots of grandiose ideas. One good one will do.

Copyright © 1999 The Events & Awards Managers of Asia and
Hamlin-Iturralde Corporation. All rights reserved.

Back to prevous page


Media Archives

Copyright © 2004 TeamAsia and Hamlin-Iturralde Corporation. All rights reserved.