Home | About TeamAsia | Clients | Job Opportunities | Speaker Opportunities | Contact Us | Sign Up  
Home > Media Articles >  
< Back   

 

 

Beijing Wins!
By Michael Alan Hamlin
July 16, 2001

There is some good news in Asia. Friday, the International Olympic Committee awarded the 2008 Olympic Games to Beijing. The awarding is sweet victory for Beijing, which in the 1993 bidding lost the 2000 Games to Sydney in a controversial decision. This time around, Beijing enjoyed a clear victory, with 56 votes compared to 22 for Toronto and 18 for Paris. Osaka, the only other Asian city competing for the games, was eliminated in an earlier round of voting with just six votes.

What accounts for Beijing's victory this time around? One of my co-authors of Marketing Asian Places (Wiley, September 2001), Irving Rein, wrote cases for the book on both the Osaka and Bejing bids. Irv is a professor of communications strategy at Northwestern University, and the author of High Visibility, a groundbreaking study on image making.

Here's his take on Beijing's success. Irv says that, "The city had a brilliant strategic marketing plan that not only featured its virtues and corrected its weaknesses, but effectively countered an aggressive attack on its human rights policies. The marketing plan, however, is just in phase one, as Beijing must deliver on its promises. The energy and focus necessary to complete the Olympic commitment illustrates how important implementation is to a successful strategic marketing plan.

"There were three key elements to Beijing's successful bid. The first was the massive efforts to match the criteria of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) on seventeen themes including environmental protection, transportation, and popular and governmental support. The Beijing response was comprehensive and conclusive. It will spend US $12.2 billion on environmental clean up alone. Beijing is rebuilding the entire public lavatory structure and training taxi cab drivers and subway workers in English language competence. Over 90 percent of its citizens support the bid. The second component was a large-scale government and corporate effort to demonstrate the solidarity and resolve of China and Beijing to the Games. The third component was the political reality of the Games being hosted in a previously underrepresented sphere of the world. Beijing lost the 2000 Games by two disputed votes to Sydney and there was a strong feeling that this injustice should be corrected. All three elements combined in relative perfect harmony to make that portion of the plan work.

"Beijing now faces implementation issues on a scale previously unprecedented in Olympic history. As in most strategic marketing plans, there is the Monday morning question: "It is nine a.m. and who is going to do what?" This question includes what experts will be hired, at what cost, when it will be done, and what will happen if deadlines are not met. For example, the air in Beijing is often so toxic many people simply cannot tolerate it. The image of Olympic marathon runners gasping for breath and dropping like flies is not one that ennobles the reputation of a city. A public relations campaign that promises a cooperative and friendly city can be quickly shattered by human rights violations such as executions of political prisoners. World opinion will also be harsh if demonstrators are treated roughly or dissenters are banished from the Olympic site. Beijing has the difficult task of not only showcasing its new face, but also proving real reform before the world's television cameras.

"Besides the enormous value of an improved image, the entire Chinese economy will receive a tremendous boost. Gross domestic product, according to Goldman and Sachs analyst Fred Hu, could rise by '0.3 percent per year from 2002 to 2008'. There will be a tremendous demand for services and construction that accompanies such a large scale endeavor. China and Beijing are facing a great challenge. They made all the right strategic marketing moves to capture the bid. Now, the world will watch as they work to deliver the rest of the plan."

In contrast, what was Osaka's problem? Irv attributes Osaka's early loss in the competition to an ineffective communications strategy. "The lesson here is that strategic marketing planning is not only building attractions, but is often lost or won on mounting strong internal and external support, anticipating objections, and getting out the message," he concludes.

"Osaka could be faulted on a number of issues that are clearly part of a strategic marketing plan. The IOC criticized the city for possible congestion problems resulting from an ambitious plan to transport athletes around the three island Olympic sites. Moreover, the large amount of city investment was taken as evidence of a lack of country support. Osaka should have anticipated these objections and countered with effective arguments. The state of the traffic infrastructure needed to be carefully outlined, and the Osaka message required a consistent and clear strategy. Kimihide Harada, director of international affairs for the Osaka bid, admitted, 'We have been very active promoting Osaka at home, but I'd like to see more output from us towards the press abroad. That, too, has been part of the learning process for us.'

"Stated succinctly, Osaka did not communicate its story because it never really got it out. The city also needed an effective theme to communicate. The competition was stiff, as Paris marketed its unparalleled ambiance and charm, Toronto its conveniently sited athletic facilities, and Beijing its economic and political positioning. Osaka was inevitably paired against Beijing, which mounted a massive effort to convince the marketplace of the legitimacy of its bid. Osaka's lukewarm effort that only belatedly included the government and failed to generate overwhelming enthusiasm from its skeptical citizens was not going to win."

Irv believes that Osaka will learn from its failure in this round, as Beijing did after 1993. But nations and cities around Asia have a lesson to learn as well during these difficult times, and it is that no strategy is complete unless it is communicated effectively to the people that count.

(Mr. Hamlin is managing director of the consultancy TeamAsia and the author of two books on Asian economies and managing in Asia. His latest book is The New Asian Corporation: Managing for the Future in Post-Crisis Asia. His e-mail address is mahamlin@teamasia.com.ph.)



Media Archives

Copyright © 2006 TeamAsia and Hamlin-Iturralde Corporation. All rights reserved.