Home | About TeamAsia | Clients | Job Opportunities | Speaker Opportunities | Contact Us | Sign Up  
Home > Media Articles >   2002 > Supply Chain Asia
< Back   

 

 

Supply Chain Asia
By Michael Alan Hamlin
Novemberr 04, 2002

Professor Hau L. Lee is director of the Stanford Global Supply Chain Management Forum and a professor at Stanford Graduate School of Business. He is also one of the world's preeminent authorities on supply chain management. Born in Hong Kong, Lee educated himself at Hong Kong University, London Business School, and the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Last week he was in Hong Kong to speak at a Stanford Alumni conference, and we met up on the sidelines and spoke about trends in supply chain management.

Professor Lee said the global economic crisis and the war on terror have caused some profound problems that will provoke equally profound changes in the way supply chains operate. "There are two trends," he told me. First, "a lot of companies have not taken accountability for inventory (of manufactured goods) committed to suppliers. This has highlighted poor contractual relationships between original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and their suppliers. Suppliers built according to forecast (at the onset of these crises) and expected OEMs to take the inventory. They will try to resist getting caught in that trap in the future."

As a result, "confused lines of responsibility is becoming a big issue." Lee noted that one major contract manufacturer was stuck with US$4.4 billion in inventory when corporations abruptly cut spending on technology, and technology vendors subsequently refused to take delivery of inventory. But he is careful to point out that what he believes are enlightened firms haven't left their suppliers in the lurch.

"Cisco actually took responsibility for their forecasts and the inventory build up so that suppliers wouldn't go away." Lee notes that for many who monitor the technology sector, Cisco's decision to write down billions of dollars worth of inventory meant "it was no longer a poster child for supply chain management." Those who believe so are shortsighted, he argues. "When the economy recovers, Cisco will be the only IT infrastructure firm with a network capable of quickly gearing up to match demand."

The second major trend in supply chain management has to do with efforts by suppliers to make sure the debacle isn't repeated. Suppliers with the leverage to do so are working to have inventory accountability clearly defined in new agreements. "Going forward, suppliers want to make responsibility very clear." A new phenomenon - the increasing prevalence of vendor hubs - has added to suppliers' concerns, and the urgency with which they seek to address accountability issues.

"Vendor hubs are a new phenomenon," Lee explained. "Typically they are owned by logistics companies. Ownership of products shipped to hubs transfers to OEMs only when product is picked up from hubs by OEMs. This is what I calls this a vending machine solution to supply chain management." The hubs can offer some relief for suppliers, however. For a discount, hub operators will frequently assume ownership of inventory in their care. But suppliers are far from happy.

"All OEMs are demanding that suppliers ship to hubs, but big suppliers are refusing, such as Intel. Ironically, the least able to do this are the ones most susceptible to this pressure." That's because many contract suppliers work for one or a limited number of OEMs, and as a result have little leverage with customers that dominate their businesses. Meanwhile, to finance inventory for their customers, they borrow money at high interest rates. The result is weak suppliers that lack the resources to quickly increase or shift production to new components when markets improve.

"The way the supply chain works is dictated by the biggest player. But this is not healthy," Lee cautioned. "Like any chain, it is as strong only as its weakest link."

Lee pointed again to Cisco as an OEM with the strategic foresight not to fall into that trap. "Cisco may no longer a poster child, but is quietly strengthening its supply chain. First, it is helping write off inventory to keep suppliers strong. Second, it is investing in hubs so that first, second, and third tier suppliers are connected to the hubs. This will strengthen Cisco's capacity to respond to recovery."

That's because connecting multi-tiered suppliers makes a dramatic difference in an OEM's capacity to quickly capitalize on market shifts, according to Lee. "Suppliers all see instantly. As a result, instead of taking six months or a year to gear up, its supplier network can begin responding to a market recovery in as little as a month." To further enhance responsiveness, Lee said Cisco has been creating production planning systems that are likewise visible to all suppliers.

"Cisco chose to do these things despite a dramatic pull back in the industry. As a result, Cisco is proving that it is a strong SC company," Lee said.

Lee believes that liberalization is another factor that will profoundly alter supply chain management, especially in Asia. "This is a great opportunity. Asian SMEs typically have strong relationships with just one or a very limited set of major customers. Liberalization presents the chance to join a larger network that will improve their leverage and terms of trade. They will no longer be passive in determining terms of trade, allowing customers to dictate to them." They will have the option of choosing customers to serve.

But Asian suppliers will need to change their mindset to take advantage of these opportunities, Lee said. "Before SMEs just waited and did what their 'masters' told them to do." Now, they must develop the networks that facilitate the development of relationships with truly profitable, even nurturing, customers like Cisco. Thanks to technology, they can take a step further, Lee said. "They can even start selling to their customers' customers."

And it's important to remember that if suppliers hadn't suffered through the fallout of the economic downturn and the demands of liberalization, they wouldn't have these opportunities. There is a silver lining, after all. At least for those prepared to see it.

(Michael Alan Hamlin is the managing director of consultancy TeamAsia and the author of three books on Asian economies and companies. His latest book is Marketing Asian Places, of which he is a co-author (Wiley, 2001). Write him at mahamlin@teamasia.com.).

Copyright © 2002 Michael Alan Hamlin. All Rights Reserved.

Back to prevous page


Media Archives

Copyright © 2003 TeamAsia and Hamlin-Iturralde Corporation. All rights reserved.