Home | About TeamAsia | Clients | Job Opportunities | Speaker Opportunities | Contact Us | Sign Up  
Home > Media Articles >   2003 > Online Myths
< Back   

 

 

Online Myths
By Michael Alan Hamlin
April 14, 2003

Accenture recently conducted a study examining the online buying habits of 2,000 consumers in the U.S. The purpose of the study was to "uncover the facts behind brand value online," according to Accenture partner Teo Lay Lim writing in the March issue of CIO-Asia. On the surface, the survey appears to have burst a number of common myths associated with online purchasing.

Among them is the notion that the Internet is all about price. Teo says the findings of Accenture suggest that price actually contributes less than 10 percent of what he calls e-Brand value. "The payoff from investing in brand selection, site speed, and other performance dimensions is greater," he noted. By brand selection, Teo appears to be referring to the availability on a retail site of a selection of established brands. In that respect, Teo's findings aren't surprising in a traditional branding sense. A principal purpose of any branding strategy is margin insulation from low-priced competitors.

However, it is true that much has been made of the notion that the Internet empowers consumers because they can quickly check multiple sites for the best prices. But even when a top brand is available at a lower price on a competing site, the online retailer's reputation for quick order processing and delivery is likely a factor that helps determine in a fairly significant way whether the cheaper price is truly attractive. If true, and it probably is, that would be further evidence of the power of a strong corporate brand for online retailers.

The fact that site speed and performance are important dimensions of the online customer's experience isn't much of a surprise. Rather than shattering a myth, this seems to confirm the general impression that bandwidth and blazing fast servers and software are a key component of the online retailer's value proposition. Buying should be a painless, simple exercise. So nothing new there.

The second myth Teo addresses is that the benefits of a strong brand provide an excellent return on investment. Teo says brand familiarity is a lowly number 10 among the top 10 buying needs among respondents. "Most online buyers learn about new sites from links and search engines - not from offline media, so the impact of offline media is less than once thought," he argues somewhat disingenuously, considering his first myth suggested that brand selection is in fact important, as well as a reputation for speed and performance. But just how disingenuous this is becomes apparent in Teo's discussion of his third myth.

And that is that marketing is the key to brand building. Instead, Teo says, "the consumer experience is the product." Of course any marketer just out of school knows that some of the world's most powerful brands are in fact experiential. Some of them are Sony, Nike, and Hershey's. Each of these brands communicates its value proposition in part through providing experiential marketing opportunities. The most obvious are the Sony, Nike and Hershey's stores where customers are invited to come in and see, touch, eat, etc (Not every experience, of course, applies to each product!).

So making websites where their products are sold experiential is, I'm afraid, hardly revolutionary. Instead, it is a matter of transferring what is a basic principle of building strong brands online. That's an important point, which Teo and his hapless readers should bear in mind. Online or otherwise, the principles of marketing are pretty much the same. While implementation may and frequently should vary, the principle behind the act stays in place.

But Teo isn't finished yet with his myths. He also believes that contrary to common perception, a bricks and mortar presence really doesn't matter much to online buyers. After the dot-bomb, many analysts suggested that there was strength in diversity and weakness is exclusive reliance on either an online presence or a traditional retail experience inside a physical rather than a virtual store. This is actually an "old" notion in Internet time. Amazon.com, Yahoo!.com, and e-Bay and others have clearly demonstrated that an online business model, if it is a solid business model, is more than just workable and in fact a bricks and mortar presence if often entirely inappropriate.

What is revealing about Teo's online brand building perspective, however, is what he says next: "The payoff from building online brand reputation is much greater." Didn't he just say that brand ranked number 10 among the top 10 buying needs? And that links and search engines were the principal methods for identifying new online retailers? So which is it, I wonder?

In fact, it's both. Links and search engines are important components of any brand building communication strategy. Teo may not realize it, but what his survey actually found is that online branding is every bit the imperative traditional branding is.

(Michael Alan Hamlin is the managing director of consultancy TeamAsia and the author of three books on Asian economies and companies. His latest book is Marketing Asian Places, of which he is a co-author (Wiley, 2001), and he is currently at work on High Visibility: The Making and Marketing of Asian Professionals into Celebrities. Write him at mahamlin@teamasia.com.).

Copyright © 2003 Michael Alan Hamlin. All Rights Reserved.

Back to prevous page


Media Archives

Copyright © 2004 TeamAsia and Hamlin-Iturralde Corporation. All rights reserved.