Home | About TeamAsia | Clients | Job Opportunities | Speaker Opportunities | Contact Us | Sign Up  
Home > Media Articles >   2003 > Building Customer Equity
< Back   

 

 

Building Customer Equity
By Michael Alan Hamlin
August 18, 2003

Fusion Brand author Nick Wreden was back in town last week urging executives to focus on building customer equity and letting go of their traditional notions of brand equity. The reasoning is straightforward. For too long, corporate strategy was designed to corner market share, rather than what Wreden calls customer equity or share of customer or share of wallet. Companies often found that they were actually subsidizing customers on the fringe as a result of relentless pursuit of market share.

The pursuit of customer share requires an overt acknowledgement that market share is no longer the standard for industry leadership. This reorientation is meant to bring corporate resources to bear on acquiring as much business as possible from profitable customers and prospects, and ignoring the rest, even when they beg to do business with you. If they want you bad enough, they'll just have to transform themselves into profitable customers.

Aside from the obvious financial implications of the refocus from market share to customer share, Wreden believes that the way companies should market and brand themselves is evolving because, ironically it seems, consumers are becoming more empowered. He points to the evolution of branding models over the last century as evidence of this tidy incongruity.

For a very long period in modern marketing terms, 1920 - 1995, the mass economy ruled, and perception of the brand was tied very closely to quality of product. During this period, market research leading to brand positioning and mass advertising were the hallmarks of powerful brands that dominated markets. However, when benchmarking product quality was catalyzed by the Japanese and high quality because a requisite rather than an attribute, things suddenly changed.

From 1995, Wreden argues, there was a sudden but what will be a relatively short-lived shift to the customer economy and empowered consumers who had greater choices, creating pressure to increase efficiency and lower prices. Quality of price, rather than product, became the chief determinant of competitiveness with the result that companies became much more focused on organizational attributes that contribute to efficient processes, lower costs, and continual, incremental refinement of products and services.

While Wreden acknowledges that this model is very much alive today, he suggests that its rapid evolution is being driven by the dawning of the demand economy. Like product and service quality, product and service efficiency is becoming commoditized with the result that companies increasingly must focus on developing closer relationships with customers in order to be able to respond quickly and efficiently to their fast-emerging desires.

This requires not just efficient processes within an organization, but throughout the supply chain, and the benchmark becomes not product or process, but time, or how little of it is used to respond in a credible, relevant, and meaningful way to desirable customers' desires. Of course, the definition of desirable customer is profitable customer, and considerable effort is expended on making that customer continually more desirable.

The way to do that is to place more resources into keeping profitable customers than recruiting new ones, with the result the organizations develop an intimate understanding of their customers' wants, desires, and purchasing patterns. That knowledge is used to manipulate those wants, desires, and purchasing patterns so that the customer becomes not just more profitable, but increasingly tied to the organization. The goal is to respond to these new personalized demands so quickly that customers find it simply too much trouble to switch to another supplier.

Wreden proposes four tools for gauging how well an organization is building closer customer relationships, or what he calls customer equity. They are: 1) Profit/revenue segmentation; 2) Customer equity dashboard; 3) RFM (recency, frequency, monetary); and, 4) Customer P&L sheets. I'd love to go through each of them with you, but as you might imagine, that would require significantly more space than I have available.

But I can leave you with some Customer Equity To-Dos (The Don'ts will also have to wait, I'm afraid.). Here they are: 1) Focus on retention, not acquisition; 2) Extend acquisition offers to existing customers; 3) Track lead generation, retention, service, and other costs; 4) Segment customers based on lifetime profitability; 5) Learn benchmarks for customer accountability; 6) Start customer recovery; and, 7) Improve pricing & revenue management.

Wreden provides a number of real-life examples of how focusing on customer equity improves profitability, and because he spent much of his professional career in Asia, he is able to relate his ideas easily to economic conditions and enterprise development here. Customer equity is a new idea, but it is a compelling one. Still, effectively leveraging Wreden's ideas still requires that corporations demonstrate parity in terms of quality and process quality. Now, they just have to go much further.

(Michael Alan Hamlin is the managing director of consultancy TeamAsia and the author of three books on Asian economies and companies. His latest book is Marketing Asian Places, of which he is a co-author (Wiley, 2001), and he is currently at work on High Visibility: The Making and Marketing of Asian Professionals into Celebrities. Write him at mahamlin@teamasia.com.).

Copyright © 2003 Michael Alan Hamlin. All Rights Reserved.

Back to prevous page


Media Archives

Copyright © 2004 TeamAsia and Hamlin-Iturralde Corporation. All rights reserved.